For week Red I wanted to write letters .
To Female Bloggers of Color about things the wrote or we talked about and why they were connected to the concepts and values that I ( only me by myself this girl here) thought were important to silence.
My first letter goes out the lovely Donna at The Silence of our Friends, ( why yes her blog title is serendipitous and related)
Dear Donna,
This is a horrible convoluted conceit as I emailed you like yesterday , but please indulge the sniffling toddler.
As per your usual your post Bitter Laughter was awesome . Kind of uncomfortable making , full of fire and brimstone but it really, really got me thinking. It also made me think back to Kindergarten .
Remember the Golden Rule.
" Treat others as you wish to be treated"
Up until blogging I thought that was a great idea . It is the liberal mantra ne plus ultra. Everyone is equal we are same under the skin , or the goal is to make us same under the skin.
Thank god I gave that ish up.
Your post which i know refer joyously to as " Hypocrisy: The Madlibs version" made me think hard about why it offended me so , and I noticed your blog title and i Thought of red and thhen my mind did a happy synaptic firing
And then my heart kind of broke.
Silence.
Silencing.
The reason the " golden rule" offends me so now , is that it appoints the user ( we'll say me ) as the "decider" of what way they should treat people. I get to say that this is the way I enjoy being treated , I will treat everyone that way and it shall be good .
As Women of Color , we know more than anyone else that we are not the same , and the incidences of oppression and violence we face , while achingly similar are often wildly divergent in their historical origins, and personal impact.
And every time someone gets up and says that this will work for women without addressing seriously the very explicit gaps ( or GORGES) in female experience , it fails certain women.
And by certain women , I mean the same women ( trans, disabled,WOC,queer, etc) over and over again.
Worse yet when it is talked about , the white women tend to phrase it ( and I'm not kidding I noted this in both real life and online conversations ) as " a constant criticism , or one criticism of feminism"
So for what is for many women a long standing barrier to them becoming part of feminism ( if i read one more white woman be shocked and awed about WOC " espousing feminist ideas" but not claiming feminism . I'm just gonna start a mockery list) is not to them a grave concern but one of the many criticisms of feminism.
Silence.
We are not specific but simply one of the many things people "complain" about, how is it to be addressed.Suddenly we are in the conglomerate with or without our permission .
Our successes are "theirs" and our challenges are their statistics.
I live in an area that has one of the highest HIV rates in America. Also an extremely high incidence of sexual violence, to my knowledge their are no immediate women's health centers or WOC friendly women's health professionals available.
Programs that were and continue to be stunted by the efforts of not just patriarchy but women who believe that any focus on WOC is divergent from the " real goals" while still campaigning using these lives to bolster their position WITHIN patriarchy.
It would be funny , if it didn't involve wondering how the two twins in my yard were gonna live with out their mother.
Silencing induces more silence permanently.
But it is better to speak.
The post itself and the post script , and your first comment from zuzu.
Donna they honestly made me cry.
In thinking about this and what this RED is trying to be, and places where there are problems and seams and things that we are doing right and doing wrong . The sheer effort on so many women are putting in , that they HAVE to put in .
Because WOC organizations are underfunded. Because people ( my simple ass included) are often inconsiderate of LGBT issues, because disabled people are so quick to be made as non obtrusive and so on and so on and so forth.
IS NOT A QUESTION OF CLARITY.
It is crystal clear we are failing each other.
It is crystal clear that from that post , it is much more important to engage and intellectually deal with men who are condescending and snide, than with women who are honest and committed.
You brought up the book and I went back through it and it still is a gut shot. These men who are condescending assholes are given point by point rebuttals. Petit,Sylvia and I can't even get our names said.
Not because of hits or traffic but because we are/were real people with real issues who invested REAL time and damn it WE WERE there and trying .
Because it was important that what we loved was treated fairly because IT HAS REAL LIFE Consequences.
Not even our names.
But whats his face can get entire paragraphs dedicated to how he's a " good guy" ?
Your entire post pouring your heart out about how this behavior is damaging and hurtful to our spirits and souls
One line about how you misunderstood and not another engagement? Something to acknowledge the actual time and feelings you were in while you did this.
Nope just a line so you didn't misunderstand HER words?
Is this truly what we are? To be used to show how they are evolving in arguments with white men?
Is it any wonder that anytime an ally posts for Red anywhere there is an upcropping of what about this case ? And that case is without fail a white woman?
OR that people still truly think that an attack on LGBT people aren't crimes about sex?
That it is ocmmon thought that because it's a DV case Megan Williams can't be a hate crime
While the difference between cyberspace and real life gets more blurred every day. The lives of WOC do not.
We are not anybody else, we are not a faceless , voiceless mass, we are NOT one and the same.
And we are not argument fodder., or stepping stones.
Do they realize we are people ?
Independent autonomous people who are NOT extensions of some nebulous ideal?
We do not wish to be treated the way they are treated
but as ourselves.
And we shall be silent on that no longer
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Ohh Donna
Posted by
Blackamazon
at
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
You're back!!! -tosses confetti-
Do they realize we are people ?
Independent autonomous people who are NOT extensions of some nebulous ideal?
Yeah, that seems to be a real stumper for a lot of people, doesn't it? I do keep pondering that one.
Awesome post, as usual.
(Relurks)
i love what you are doing here ba.
BA, this post touched me in a place I can't really talk about right now b/c it hurts too much. I've had the silencing happen to me in real life by white friends. I wonder what it will take for some people to understand just how hurtful their behaviour really is.
Sighs.
HUGS! You're making me think of things I want to post, but couldn't fully articulate, or had second thoughts about. I'm going to find the words and do it too!
Andrew, why don't you get a blog? I see you commenting all the time and know you must have at least a few posts to write!
BA -
Great to see you back!
As your post beautifully pointed out, it seems a better "rule" would be: Treat others the way they would like to be treated. Keeping this in mind would remind me not to assume that just because I'd like to be treated one way, someone else would feel the same. More importantly, it would force me to consider that trying to step into someone else's shoes won't necessarily cut it, either. Especially when I've never worn those kind of shoes before. Instead, I've got to educate myself by reaching out, asking, finding how that person would like to be treated in a given situation. Of course, this won't always be possible or practical. In those cases, I guess I've got to hope that I've gained enough knowledge to put me on the right track, and then tread lightly.
Now none of this should affect the minimum interpersonal guarantees that everyone deserves: that I will treat you fairly, respectfully, sensitively, with dignity, etc. It's just taking the extra steps from basing my actions on how I would want someone to act towards me to imagining how I think someone would like to be treated to actually finding out from that person exactly what s/he wants.
Anyways, I'm thankful that you're back. I'm always thinking about what I've read long after I shut off the computer.
wb, ba!
(word ver: "rumgw" Does this mean we should celebrate your return with rum? YO HO HO.)
* is o for Andrew having a blog you hae no idea*
Waves at everyone
BELLE how is you bronchitis!
Lol Donna and BA
I do want to start blogging, but then I read you guys, and bfp and Kactus and R. Mildred, and many others, and you're all amazing, and I don't think I could move people the way you guys do in that amazing way ::shuts up now::
I was thinking more about this post and Donna's post and it brought me to a connection with a quote I read on the new SF People of Color Carnival http://starkeymonster.livejournal.com/221185.html
"It is not that [Africans] have not been speaking; but rather that our voices - through a system of racism - have been systematically disqualified as valid knowledge; or else represented by whites, who ironically become the 'experts' of ourselves"
I mean, it kinda boils down to this, doesn't it? And you can include Native Americans, Latinos, and other marginalized groups along with Africans and it doesn't change the overall meaning of the quote, but instead brings into sharper focus just how many voices are silenced.
Ok, so I did it!
It's empty right now, but I'll work on that as soon as I can figure out all the Blogger stuff lol o_0
yes.
Our successes are "theirs" and our challenges are their statistics.
This sentence really struck me for its power and simplicity. I'm glad you're back.
Post a Comment