Me and my ass

I have an enourmous ass. I do . I'm a thicky thicky thick girl. I like it . it's a two hander. Many friends and loved ones have used it as a pillow ,a drum, a book stand, a kickboxing pad ( BEAR!!!!!!!!!!!) .It's half genetics, a quarter "Ooh I need to hit the gym" a, a quarter hello walking and stairs EVERYWHERE. Should I ever lose the weight I desire my ass will still be enourmous for my body.

I am informing people just so they know what their confronting when I say

" Kiss my big round, bubble brown, black ass"

( that opening is vegankid approved)

Now right below this post is the link( comments are now closed OF COURSE) to the ReclusiveLeftist's link/ thread so that I may let you know what prompted that.

Now the number one problem I have occurs in the setup . And please don't be confused it's a set up. It's in it's small entry full of subtextual analytical problems and sneaky removal of agency connundrums. And when we get to the comments it becomes full of things that start me looking for my vaseline and a safe place to put my earrings

To critique a sexist comment one MUST bring in racism because the true injustice isn't the remarkable stupid of the comment but the fact that " if it had been about brown folk " there'd be a ruckus.

God forbid that they get something more than "us". Now I will not be adressing the continual stupid that is the oppresion olympics(as Shannon has tackled it in her post about this though I would add Nubian's gender does not trump race to it),here.

The next problem I have is The " he's just a colorful Latino". Wow a nice little snide sarcastic slip in that ' critiques" ....... What exactly. The justification that will be used for his dumbass comment? Now besides the fact that it hasn't been used yet as far as I know, it also is indicative of the mindset of the author and how she perceives what Latino means. So her own analysis of his comment is racially broken down AND WE HAVEN'T LEFT THE SECOND THREE SENTENCE PARAGRAPH). The author reveals a preoccupation and complete lack of information on Latinoness ( mind you all of central america, most of south america, half the carribean all the same damn thing all Latin no differentiation among how many odd countries).

Also she expresses a bit of pique that " He would probably be fired, don’t you think?" had teh comment been about black people. Now who do you think would have lead the charge for the firing. Now Has a young urban sister I have some issues with the NAACP many more with the Urban League ( YOU LET GEORGE BUSH SPEAK ?? WHAT ?!?), but HAD Cesar Milano made that statement I would bet a grip that both organisations would have grabbed somebody and thrown a fit. They've done more for less ( Yes I am engaging in a false projection but let me set up I'll explain later)

So even in Violet's false dilemma fallacy where she conjectures one would happen and the other wouldn't and were given a choice only to disagree or agree with her absurd commentary she subtextually and later textually reveals a bias that some societal evolution and not of course the work of black people that have made this change IF and lordy I do mean IF it has occured. BEnevolent society has preferred one of the other not actually blood and tears by the marginalised. She either forgot that part or decided it wasn't important.

That allusion also prevents you know having to do anything or yell at anyone for it. As a WOMAN my first reaction is " NOW , LOWV, um are you guys asleep at the wheel" . Because benevolent society has evolved but "In this case, that it’s still basically okay to announce in public that women are an inferior “species” who are more emotional than men. " means it's external. Want a ruckus raise one ! As a woman I plan to and looky I can do it without mentioning any other groups gains,trials and travails cause MY CAUSE HAS MERIT ON ITS OWN!

( Mind you this is not shifting responsibility for the stupid of others, but I resent to the high holy heavens the unspoken idea that we GET shit when we FOUGHT for it)

AND THEN ( yes after all of that we get to the comments)

At this point it goes from wow that was Off to " THE STUPID IT BURNS" and is probably while this wasn't a more concillatory woowoo post and is now a point point memo on why people need to kiss my voluptous ass.

Ginmar whose entire conduct in that thread is flip and disgusting not to mention fantastically misanthropic in her appraisal of black men and disgustingly presumptious about intraracial gender politics , gets me to the promised land of finally TRYING TO PHYSICALLY CHOKE MY SCREEN with :

ginmar says:
Wow, Shannon, do some checking yourself. There’s a difference between pointing out that racism is taken more seriously in society than sexism and saying that ‘black people have it better than us.’

Now besides the inherent contradiction in terms which doesn't suprise me.If one is taken seriously than the other ( which as a member of both good god the stupid) and you're complaint is that this respect is a somewhat necessary commodity , does it or not mena that one party having more than the other is both a comparison and a value judgement where the party that is receiving less is being mistreated and has it worse than another ergo one group has it better, (One is acceptable, One isn't ). If the point is not there is a preferential balance what is it.

Also if I see one more think that being snide and sarcastic is somehow less damaging than honest anger and passion ( which almost is always along racial lines) I will commit violence! intellectual condescension and smug superiority aren't debate tacits but the marks of an entitled assine ignorance. Can't prove her wrong , then prove her dumb!

Scroll through the dicking around about alliances and voting ( HA)

Which leads us to.....

Comment 34 the golden ticket WHICH I QUOTE IN IT"S ENTIRETY ( lest I take ity out of context)

I hope that most of my readers have better comprehension skills than Shannon, but just in case I’ll clarify here: the point of my post is that sexism is more acceptable in the world than racism. This isn’t my opinion; it’s an observable fact. I’m not saying that sexism is worse than racism, or that racism has gone away; nor am I comparing the status of any oppressed groups. I’m simply pointing out — and here it is again — that sexism is more acceptable in the world than racism.
Our species has reached the point in its moral evolution where we generally agree that racism is wrong. Racism is still ubiquitous and horrible and practiced around the world, but it’s officially a Bad Thing. Sexism, on the other hand, is still regarded as an acceptable cultural variation. Many of us in the West deplore it, but in most of the world women still have sub-human status and the official global community isn’t about to do anything about it. Ethnic cleansing will get the U.N. peacekeepers on your doorstep; treat women like cattle and you’re just practicing your traditional culture.
Consider the difference between the global condemnation of apartheid South Africa, for example, and the complete absence of any censure whatsoever of Saudi Arabia or any number of other countries where women don’t have basic human rights. A woman in Saudi Arabia has about the same rights as a camel, but hey, that’s their culture. Watch the next Olympics, and note how many countries do not allow women to compete, or to compete only while wearing bags over their heads. Ask yourself what would happen if a country disallowed an ethnic minority from competing or forced its members to compete only while wearing a special Hefty Bag costume. Any such nation would of course be barred from the Games.
Again, I’m not comparing the relative badness of sexism or racism. Just pointing out where we are in our moral evolution.


First SENTENCE rather than address her points civilly she questions her intelligence and the intelligence of anyone who might find worth in Shannon's critique. She then contradicts herself because she is comparing the ammounts of a commodity and finding one receiving superior to another in receiving that commodity.

Then here the privilege raises it's head and proceeds to spill over the rest of the post and the thread :

This isn’t my opinion; it’s an observable fact.

I am trying to keep thispost shorter than my thesis proposal but that HAD to be bolded. Observable FACT.

According to what observer , according to what criteria. I'm conjecturing that as the author she is the observer which means her judgement can or cannot decide fact. She also decides that sexism ( which we haven't defined in the post) is an accepted cultural fact . IN WHAT CULTURES( that joy comes later). Many of us in the west deplore it ( The west okaay) but in most of the world ( you mean everything not First world) women are treated as cattle . ACCORDING TO WHO? The women themselves of the grand wester decision about what is acceptable treatment

Then come the comparisons .

Ethnic Cleanisng gets the US to your doorstep :

If you're in NY and you saw a small red clouds go up accompanied by what sounds like the shreik or a banshee look towards Queens

Rwanda
Darfur
Bosnia

How long did it take the UN to intervene ? Are the people who are suffering not women enough for you? the violence that befalls them WHICH INCLUDES THEIR FEMINITY doesn't make youre comparison.

Then South African apartheid and Saudi Arabia.

WOW. One as if global condemnation is worth the paper it's printed on. Two as if either party needs facile comparisons or a comparative for a sensible human being to go both are Wrong .

More importantly like the people under it need a great white hypeist to plunder their experiences to prove a facetious point AND deny them their own agency while doing it not to mention ignore the work they do and have done to flog differences in an obscenely privileged Western society.

And teh culmination the OLYMPIC GAMES. Becaus ethe chance to being jingoistic is what we really need to ask ourselves when adressing these problems.

BUT OBSERVABLE FACT. Observation we all know is dfferent in a microscope,telescope and to the naked eye. So those were my OBSERVABLE FACTS

AlaS,BL,and ABW( who I never say I love enough to) provide their own takes all of which I agree with mostly.

But here'smy "twist"( Victory to whoever gets the reference).

As people meander over to rightfully go what the fuck

Violet later in the comments thread Rejects " white liberal" for historian.

Good at least my hypothesis is correct and my exercise as well. Violet couches racial sterotyping behing a liberal viewpoint and then uses shoddy history as a way of trying to legitamize what at best is a badly though point at worst an ACTIVELY racist one .

Notice that , notice how that's the retreat notice how when speaking about the treatment of PEOPLE it is more comfortable in the "liberal " bloggosphere to measure someone's intelligence by familiarity with esoterica( class bias) or " intelligence"? ALL of which are attached to benefits and privileges garnered in all sorts of ways. Who were the main benefits of AA that seems to give OBSERVEABLE FACT POWER ( not letting it go nope never) How many will regard this post as deeper cause i through in some 50 dollar words ?

Those of you think I was to harsh.

Think how that feels every day of your life. Think how that feels no matter how smart, or qualified you are. Figure out how civil you feel like being after protracted exposure , think how many times you can curl up in tears as people spring board of your body and your struggles and how many times you can get called a fool. Think about uprooting your people, think about killing your people, think about forceably converting you're people, in some cases think about ELIMINATING you're people and think about it everyone making an academic exercise about a motherfucking dog trainer and Olympic competitions

Tell me how kind you want to be?

Think about it and while you'e thinking

" Kiss my big round, bubble brown, black ass"